Edda Mamedova vs Audrey Moutama Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Jun at 10:31 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Mamedova vs A. Moutama

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Mamedova 1 - 0 Moutama
They have played 2 sets in total, with Edda Mamedova winning 2 and Audrey Moutama winning 0. The last match between Edda Mamedova and Audrey Moutama was at the W15 Kayseri, 17-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Edda Mamedova getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mamedova | 1 |
| Moutama | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Kayseri(06-17-25)
E. Mamedova vs A. Moutama H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.12% (55-43) | Career Total W/L | 47.37% (9-10) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. Mamedova vs A. Moutama Match Preview:
- Second serve success is crucial. Moutama has recently won 38.1% of their second serve points, surpassing Mamedova's 28.28%. Could this indicate a stronger serve game?
- Returning prowess is a key element. Moutama has outperformed by winning 52.69% of opponents' second serve points, while Mamedova has achieved 50.35%.
- Moutama also leads in first serve return success, capturing 42% of points compared to Mamedova's 40.67%.
- Under pressure, Moutama saves 55.26% of breakpoints compared to Mamedova's 45.03%—a potential advantage when facing crucial moments in matches.
- Looking at the last year, Moutama holds a 70% match win rate compared to Mamedova’s 64.71%.
- Both players have shown strength on hard courts; Moutama with a 53% win rate and Mamedova at 56%.
- Analyzing the level of play, Mamedova has been more active with a 71.43% win rate in $10K tournaments, slightly higher than Moutama’s 70% in the same category.
- Interestingly, Moutama has faced tougher opponents on average, with an opponent rank of 151.1, compared to Mamedova's 331.5. Does this suggest greater experience against high-caliber players?
- In deciding set scenarios, Moutama shines, winning 75% of these situations, whereas Mamedova's success rate is 50%.
- While Moutama converts 40.74% of break points, Mamedova is marginally better, converting 45.19%.
Editorial Prediction (June 16, 2025, UTC):
As we evaluate the head-to-head statistics, Moutama seems to possess several advantages going into this match. Their superior second serve and return game indicate a capability to dominate rallies and maintain pressure on Mamedova.
Furthermore, Moutama's greater ability to handle breakpoints and deciding sets suggests resilience in critical moments, which could be decisive especially in closely contested games.
Analyzing the strength of competition each player has faced, Moutama has competed against higher-ranked opponents on average. This experience could provide an added edge in challenging matches.
While Mamedova does have a slight advantage in break point conversion, Moutama's comprehensive set of strengths across key areas renders them the likely winner of this upcoming tennis match.
Edda Mamedova vs Audrey Moutama Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Mamedova vs A. Moutama H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:4:42 | Average Match Time | 1:4:42 |
| 79% (38/48) | 1st Serve % | 59% (29/49) |
| 61% (23/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (16/29) |
| 70% (7/10) | 2nd Serve Win % | 20% (4/20) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 59% (29/49) | Return Points Win % | 38% (18/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Mamedova Recent Matches Played
A. Moutama Recent Matches Played

E. Mamedova vs A. Moutama Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.12% (55/43) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.37% (9/10) |
| 55.71% (122/97) | Sets Win/Loss | 46.34% (19/22) |
| 52.52% (1054/953) | Games Win/Loss | 48.68% (185/195) |
| 60.32% (38/25) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.06% (8/9) |
| 45.45% (10/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 53.85% (7/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 56 | Aces Total | 16 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 231 | Total Double Faults | 64 |
| 1:31:12 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 401.79 | Average Opponent Rank | 324.47 |
| 62% (3423/5507) | 1st Serve % | 58% (353/612) |
| 58% (1971/3423) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (187/353) |
| 42% (883/2084) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (112/259) |
| 52% (429/833) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (29/65) |
| 50% (2915/5854) | Return Points Win % | 41% (255/617) |
| 47.06% (16/18) | Challenger W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 60.94% (39/25) | Futures W/L | 57.14% (8/6) |
| 57% (54/95) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (9/19) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 81% (13/16) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 50% (13/26) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 89% (54/48) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (8/8) |
| 11% (54/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (8/0) |
| 14% (43/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (11/1) |